Still, restorative services extend far beyond the realm of clothing; which is why ReUSE collaborates with Nimble repair, a household appliances repair service. "Right now the most important thing that we can do for impact to minimize environmental harm is to use the things that already exist as long as possible; and that's where repair is critical, “ said Kimberley Schroder, the founder of Nimble. “It's just maybe it's not easy or not everybody knows how to do it, but somebody out there can do it. So how do we find that person?"
Nimble is able to optimize the process by connecting specialists to those in need of repair, highlighting that it is neither a lack of supply or demand, but a gap in market infrastructure that keeps repair marginalized. Still, repair is a skill anyone can learn. Organizations like StopWaste in Oakland host weekly workshops centered around promoting self-reliance, recruiting experienced professionals to volunteer in teaching self-sustaining repair for a variety of items. It's not enough that consumers become more aware of repair options; producers need to be compelled to manufacture higher quality items.
A common grievance with modern manufactured goods is that appliances are no longer "made to last"; that products are often sold at a low quality, and thus break apart after limited use. This phenomenon is often referred to as planned obsolescence, the deliberate shortening of an object's lifespan by producers, and it has fully been integrated into the profit model of many companies. Planned obsolescence also functions to withhold reparative infrastructure in the form of making products difficult or expensive to fix, or by refusing to make necessary tools for repair available.
That's where California's 2024 Right to Repair Act comes in. The principle of right to repair is self-evident, that items should have repairability incorporated into their design, and parts and manuals for repair purposes should be readily available. As Schroder explains, "the goal is that more items will be designed repairable in the first place and that repairability will be factored into a business’s model so ideally right repair legislation is great". The Act has a huge potential to engender sustainable consumption, and moreover to fight against the overconsumption of these goods. Repair has been found to reduce the need for a new purchase by up to 82%, almost offsetting a purchase. The only issue with this system is that the responsibility still lies solely on the consumer to take repair into their own hands, when this issue is largely top down.
The solution and the counterpart to the Right to Repair Act are producer responsibility laws. Last year, California passed the Responsible Textile Recovery Act, set to go into effect in 2028, mandating that these corporations are liable for the complete oversight of their apparel, including their repair, disposal, recycle, and safe management. "That's what we really need,” Schroder said. “If you make a thing you're responsible for that thing not just until you sell it but it's whole life. You're responsible for its disposal and therefore you're responsible for its repair to minimize its disposal." The bill is a watershed incentive for firms to create more circular models, internalizing the cost of repair and waste management and holding these corporations accountable for the environmental devastation of their practices and to regulate producer behavior.